<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>SEOserpent - Latest Comments in Why #1 isn&amp;#8217;t necessary</title><link>http://seoserpent.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://seoserpent.disqus.com/why_1_isn8217t_necessary/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:38:39 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Why #1 isn&amp;#8217;t necessary</title><link>http://www.seoserpent.com/2008-09/guaranteed-seo-results/#comment-3344231</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is splitting hairs and they both go hand and hand.  One without the other is pointless and you even pointed out "visibility" as a defining trait of SEM which ties into SEO.  ;)  I think we both agree on your last sentence!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marty Martin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:38:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why #1 isn&amp;#8217;t necessary</title><link>http://www.seoserpent.com/2008-09/guaranteed-seo-results/#comment-3341704</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed that being number one isn't the be all and end all however, I would say that SEO is about being number 1.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yeah, I'll split hairs but SEO is optimizing for the search engines, right?  So technically the higher the better.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;SEM, is marketing through the search engines, this is more about "higher conversions, ROI and visibility" being number 1 here is simply a "nice" bonus.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;K, done splitting hairs.  Agreed, there's way more to doing business on the internet than just number 1 rankings.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:05:32 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>